Hi first time poster. I'm still working my way through the podcast archive. Really enjoying the podcast.
I have an associate that is unfortunately extremely susceptible to woo and has recently fallen hard for this new thing called Functional Patterns http://www.functionalpatterns.com/
. It's an exercise method which is aggressive towards science and spends an unusual amount of energy attacking science and the scientific community. It seems to me that it is preemptively attacking science before it can be debunked. That way if it turns out to be hocus pocus then it could claim that "science" is just being spiteful and/or corrupt.
I'm not saying that Functional Patterns (FP) is not an effective exercise methodology but while talking to my friend I noticed a few red flags. I don't know if it was just my friend's warped interpretation of FP but he definitely associates it with:
1. curing chronic pain (this one is a common boast in the fitness industry so nothing new there)
2. preventing disease in a more significant way than just being more physically active would normally do so,
3. and creating a spiritual mindset that is in my opinion both anti-scientific and new-age in nature. Alters behavior that could change the world! (This isn't that new either)
I haven't yet found much that supports that third one online so take that one with a grain of salt. It could just be my friend's misrepresenting FP or it could be my own fallible interpretation of it. I have read hints of this in this "Letter To The Fitness Industry" http://www.functionalpatterns.com/a-letter-to-the-fitness-industry/
on the FP website as well as from this obvious antagonist to FP here: https://bretcontreras.com/challenging-naudi-aguilar-of-functional-patterns-to-a-debate/
It could be that FP is keeping the more radical views out of the general view a la Scientology and Mormonism or I could be way off the scent.
My main interest is Functional Patterns' apparent animosity towards science. My friend has just returned from a training course in America so he can be a local redistributor of the brand AKA an official FP trainer and it could just be his nature but the intensity of his loyalty and defense of FP borders on cult-like fervor. Has he been suckered by a guru? If it's the real deal why is it so adamant that it doesn't need scientific testing?
With only a little bit of research I've found enough to be sceptical of Functional Patterns but I've by no means performed a deep dive. Don't get me wrong, if it works I'll be the first to get on board but what's up with the guru/anti-science angle?
Has anyone else already researched FP? What have you found?
P.S. TNG is the best Star Trek series.