Author Topic: Website (theskepticsguide.org) Change suggestions  (Read 6913 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark7300

  • The Happy Bunny
  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 3930
  • Other people are the problem.
Re: Donations
« Reply #30 on: Dec 22, 2011, 02:13:18 PM »
if they wish to increase the number and the amount of donations made they need to change a number of things.

They should make the option to donate more prominent.
They need to offer clear options for specific donations. In other words the option to donate per episode or a donation for a specific goal. For instance an event they wish to organize, bandwidth, whatever... People will donate more if they have a good idea of what will happen with their money. If there was a clear breakdown of goals (travel, website costs, podcast costs, etc) you could choose to donate to a specific goal or to the general budget. it would also be possible to track % of funding achieved needed for an episode/year/month/goal.

Steve needs to mention the possibility of donating every single episode. He needs to ask explicitly for the donations and he needs to do so regularly. This will be more effective if he states clearly how a little can help a lot. $5 buys us.... $10 buys us.. etc.

it is clear that they are not that interested in the fundraising part and want to spend more time on the skepticism. For obvious reasons. However, they would achieve a lot more if they had more cash...

I'm a Pareidoliaologist.

Offline xxi_centuryboy

  • Brand New
  • Posts: 7
  • Apathetic bloody planet, I've no sympathy at all
Re: Website (theskepticsguide.org) Change suggestions
« Reply #31 on: Mar 04, 2012, 08:27:41 AM »
The SGUFans Link appears to be broken and sends me out of the site. I would recommend taking it out if not in use anymore.

Offline Billzbub

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Website (theskepticsguide.org) Change suggestions
« Reply #32 on: Jul 25, 2012, 10:06:42 AM »
Can you add a section to the web site that gives various methods of using smart phones to listen to the podcasts?  I've been using BeyondPod for a while but it is screwing up now and I need a new solution.  I thought I could just zip over to the web page and get some instructions for using this or that podcast player for Android, but I don't see any information like that here.

The reason I want a podcast player rather than just streaming it from the web site is so I can listen to 15 minutes on my way to work and pick up where I left off on my way home from work.  I don't think streaming from the web site lets me do that.

Thanks.

Offline av8rmike

  • Off to a Start
  • *
  • Posts: 47
  • SGU Transcriber
    • SGU Transcripts Page
Re: Website (theskepticsguide.org) Change suggestions
« Reply #33 on: Apr 08, 2013, 12:26:39 PM »
There should be a link to the transcription site (http://www.sgutranscripts.org) on the front page. We have a small group of dedicated transcribers that are working to type up and categorize every SGU and 5x5 episode, and we've put in way too much work for the last year to go unnoticed. We have a page with all of the skeptical quotes collected and even a memorial page for Mike Lacelle.
Ideally, each notes page should link to its own transcript page, but not all of those exist yet for every episode, and that's a lot of pages to change. I'll settle for one link on the main page for now.

Offline ST

  • Keeps Priorities Straight
  • ***
  • Posts: 276
Re: Website (theskepticsguide.org) Change suggestions
« Reply #34 on: Apr 22, 2013, 01:40:04 PM »
A "skepticism 101" or something, to explain (scientific) skepticism to new comers, or at least a link to other sites' dittos. Perhaps it's just me, but I think the site is pretty hard to digg at for people who aren't already self-identified skeptics.

Offline hungrydragon

  • Brand New
  • Posts: 8
Problems with the SGU Listener Info survey
« Reply #35 on: May 06, 2013, 10:52:22 PM »
Not sure this is the right place, but here goes.

After listening to the most recent episode (#407), I jumped on to do the listener survey and at a glance I could tell there were going to be problems.

So, question by question, what did the SGU listener Info survey get wrong.

1) What is your age?

Okay, this one is fine. Off to a good start. It is however a free text field and actually let me put 'spaghetti' as my age.

2) Sex:

Using the word 'sex' suggests the question is limiting itself to the biological sex of the respondent.
Only two options? What about Intersex? Or 'other'? Or those that do not like to be identified by their gonads?
In these enlighten days the moment this question is put out there the lack of other related questions is curious. No questions about Gender Identity? Sexual Orientation? Gender Expressions?

3) Education level:

The list of options here is very US centric. Down here in Australia we don't have 'middle' school. But, okay, we can figure it out I guess. But... wait a second, there are a bunch of tertiary education levels missing, where are all the pre-bachelor certifications? And why isn't this list in order. And, oh my, college, how cute. I once meet a guy that actually had 'GOLF101' on his transcript.

4) Employment status:

This one is mostly okay, just two oddities. The phrase 'employed for wages' suggests there is going to be another options for 'employed' on the list, maybe something like 'employed for board' or 'employed for food'. But when there is no other variate then the specification of wages seems odd. The other problem is, can we use something other than 'out of work', maybe something that doesn't scream "your a failure if you don't have a job", even just the dull 'unemployed' is less judgemental.

5) Household income:

So... you want this in my local currency right? You did put a dollar sign, so that limits it to about 20 currencies. Leaving US centricity aside, this also assumes a nuclear family in one house. If I rent do I count my flatmates? Should I include both my boyfriends income, even if they don't know about each other? What if me and the wife are separated, do I count her income? What if I just don't want to tell you?

6) Marital Status:

'Never married' makes it sound like a social failure, what's wrong with the word 'single'? I'm onto my third wife, so I'm widowed, divorced and married, but you don't have that as an option. If I'm in a civil union in a country/state that does not recognise gay marriage, which option should I pick?

7) Number of children in house?

What is it with houses that you find so fascinating? I only have the kids on the fourth weekend of the month, so they ain't here right now. Does anyone even do nuclear family any more?

8) Do you own or rent your home?

This is the first question to actually have a binary choice in the wording of the question itself, so obviously this is the first question to give 'other' as a valid answer.

9) Of the 400+ shows we have produced what percentage have you listened to?

Two words: percentile groups. If the options need to be broken down into 4 groups then the options should read '26%-50%', not just an outright '50%'. By giving the option of 'other' here and having 4 precise percentages listed, someone who has listened to 95% should put that in 'other' right?

Survey design is fiendishly complicated and best practise are always shifting, and I understand that your probably only gathering this data for some sort of marketing reasons.

I know I've been a bit silly on some of these, the age for example. But others such as sex and marriage are hot button issues these days, and should not be taken lightly.

Why is this even important? Because an off-putting question on a survey will usually result in the survey not being submitted, and that just skews the data.

All the best,
David.

PS: I hope whoever wrote the survey doesn't take all this too personally.

 

personate-rain