Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11]   Go Down

Author Topic: Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT?  (Read 2162 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

FX

  • Earnest Young Man
  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3037
  • Mostly Harmless
Re: Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT?
« Reply #150 on: November 21, 2009, 08:20:37 AM »
I made a lengthy and time consuming post last night, but it was formatted terribly due to copy and paste of html tags along with text.

It is still sitting in my buffer, it will take many minutes to edit it down to a post.

Logged
"First they ignore us, then they ridicule us, then they fight us, then we win." --Mahatma Gandhi

Yeah, because if you type it on the internet it must be true

rolla_costa

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1380
  • I don't understand people.
    • WWW
Re: Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT?
« Reply #151 on: November 21, 2009, 09:26:08 AM »
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/health/desiree-jennings-flu-shot-reaction-111909
watch the vid, she now stutters when she talks about her illness but not other times.   does that not sound psychogenic to you?
Logged
SGUFORUMS dot net, it's dot com.

illusionincarnate

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Doublethunk
Re: Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT?
« Reply #152 on: November 21, 2009, 09:56:43 AM »
This just in: injection with nerve toxins linked to psychogenic nerve damage!
Logged
You know, I don't care what's in these vaccines.  Doesn't matter to me at all.  Why?  Because it doesn't matter at all.  - Calinthalus, explaining the logical doctrines of the "Skeptic"

FX

  • Earnest Young Man
  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3037
  • Mostly Harmless
Re: Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT?
« Reply #153 on: November 21, 2009, 09:57:43 AM »
But really, non of us know the medical details around here. Till more info comes out...

...Continue blind speculation!!!

Indeed.  Opinions are so much more interesting than facts.
Logged
"First they ignore us, then they ridicule us, then they fight us, then we win." --Mahatma Gandhi

Yeah, because if you type it on the internet it must be true

rolla_costa

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1380
  • I don't understand people.
    • WWW
Re: Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT?
« Reply #154 on: November 21, 2009, 11:33:04 AM »
This just in: injection with nerve toxins linked to psychogenic nerve damage!

I don't care if this is sarcasm or not, the point is that if the symptoms are psychogenic, then by definition there isn't any and were never any damaged nerves.
Logged
SGUFORUMS dot net, it's dot com.

Wakefield

  • But I'm feeling much better now...
  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5690
  • And then, one day, at Bible Camp...
    • WWW
Re: Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT?
« Reply #155 on: November 21, 2009, 10:39:43 PM »
This just in: injection with nerve toxins linked to psychogenic nerve damage!

I don't care if this is sarcasm or not, the point is that if the symptoms are psychogenic, then by definition there isn't any and were never any damaged nerves.

I think II has already demonstrated sufficient scientific illiteracy to not understand what you just said.
Logged
Stupid people who can't handle complex acts like "getting enough protein without eating a hamburger" shouldn't try to be vegan. I think being a vegan and being an atheist should both come with a minimum IQ requirement. If you fail the IQ test, then it's back to the church meat raffle for you!

Kim Barron

  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 516
Re: Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT?
« Reply #156 on: November 22, 2009, 11:51:53 AM »
This just in: injection with nerve toxins linked to psychogenic nerve damage!

I don't care if this is sarcasm or not, the point is that if the symptoms are psychogenic, then by definition there isn't any and were never any damaged nerves.

You are assuming he reads and thinks about the responses, rather than just waiting his turn to make another post and another chance to try to convert us to his way of thinking.  It isn't a conversation but a lecture.
There are others on this board that have views that are different from others'.  But they know how to have a conversation and are not insulting and condescending.  No wonder they get more responses to their questions.

I think II has already demonstrated sufficient scientific illiteracy to not understand what you just said.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11]   Go Up
« previous next »