All he does is spew aphorisms with no substance, no evidence and no logic.
He points to various independent data points and says that proves his bald assertion.
Mlodinow does a really good job of countering. He shows that Deepak starts with a premise and just cherry picks data.
He just said 'The fact that mind isn't matter.....' No, that isn't a fact Deepak, where does that come from?
Anyway, I've listened to a lot of woo woo on the web. NO ONE packs it in as densely as Deepak.
It's becoming painful, I suspect I'm a masochist.