Topic: Cancer is not a disease. It is a mechanism of protection and survival

[Johnny Slick]

No, we're not looking for evidence of "spooky action". We're looking for verifiable evidence that your claims actually work. I think there *might* be one whole link in there that could lead to someone's opinion about stuff, but I'm still not seeing an actual study on cancer not being a disease but a mechanism of protection and survival. So do you have evidence like this or not? I'm sorry, but you can spend 5,000, 10,000 or 100,000 words talking about stuff but ultimately we need tests and data and good sample sizes and proper controls. This is the 21st century; you don't get to "prove" things with dizzying logic anymore.

[Johnny Slick]

I'm still just looking for evidence, period.

Use the brain that you were given and go find it somewhere else if I am unable to provide it for you.

Quite frankly, the brain that I was given is telling me that you are completely full of bullshit. I am offering you a chance to prove my brain wrong.

[gschreeuwer]

I'm still just looking for evidence, period.

Use the brain that you were given and go find it somewhere else if I am unable to provide it for you.

Quite frankly, the brain that I was given is telling me that you are completely full of bullshit. I am offering you a chance to prove my brain wrong.

I'm not interested in proving anything to your brain. I know I'm full of bullshit. You're not telling me anything I don't already know but I also know that you're being lazy and not checking out anything I've said. Don't believe it. Why would you? I've not an evidence junky like you, not that there's anything wrong with that but I'm not going to do the work for you. I'll do it to satisfy my own knowledge and cement what I already know but I won't do it prove anything to you or your brain. It's up to both you and your brain to go get your own questions answered by someone who may be able to provide the evidence based answers you're seeking.

[gschreeuwer]

No, we're not looking for evidence of "spooky action". We're looking for verifiable evidence that your claims actually work. I think there *might* be one whole link in there that could lead to someone's opinion about stuff, but I'm still not seeing an actual study on cancer not being a disease but a mechanism of protection and survival. So do you have evidence like this or not? I'm sorry, but you can spend 5,000, 10,000 or 100,000 words talking about stuff but ultimately we need tests and data and good sample sizes and proper controls. This is the 21st century; you don't get to "prove" things with dizzying logic anymore.

I'm afraid you will not find evidence based anything on this because politics and power would not allow for that. However, clinical evidence I can give you. I have plenty of that. That may be too empirical for you, possibly. Yet I have plenty of patients and clients who would testify to this process being highly beneficial and useful for them.

You will not find this evidence from anyone on the planet. You'll be searching till you die. There is a science that supports this but it's too challenging to be accepted so easily which is way it sounds like faith healing and whatever else you might propose it to be.

[Johnny Slick]

You haven't presented anything. You've made some points about quantum mechanics which, aside from being pulled out of your ass, have zero and shit all to do with the original claims that you made in this thread, and when asked again and again for evidence of the original claims, you hem and haw and then go back into talking some more bullshit about quantum mechanics. No offense, but whether your claims are true or not, you are behaving exactly the same way that a fraudster behaves. All you have to do to stop these comparisons is to post a link to actual evidence. That's it. The fact that you refuse to do so - at this point I have to assume that it's a refusal and not some inability to understand what I/we mean by the request - makes me more and more convinced that you are, in fact, a fraudster.

But hey... you can still prove me wrong. Provide some evidence and I'll be happy to say that I was incorrect. Note: evidence is not "1,000 random words about quantum".

[Johnny Slick]

No, we're not looking for evidence of "spooky action". We're looking for verifiable evidence that your claims actually work. I think there *might* be one whole link in there that could lead to someone's opinion about stuff, but I'm still not seeing an actual study on cancer not being a disease but a mechanism of protection and survival. So do you have evidence like this or not? I'm sorry, but you can spend 5,000, 10,000 or 100,000 words talking about stuff but ultimately we need tests and data and good sample sizes and proper controls. This is the 21st century; you don't get to "prove" things with dizzying logic anymore.

I'm afraid you will not find evidence based anything on this because politics and power would not allow for that. However, clinical evidence I can give you. I have plenty of that. That may be too empirical for you, possibly. Yet I have plenty of patients and clients who would testify to this process being highly beneficial and useful for them.

You will not find this evidence from anyone on the planet. You'll be searching till you die. There is a science that supports this but it's too challenging to be accepted so easily which is way it sounds like faith healing and whatever else you might propose it to be.

I'm still waiting for your evidence. Note that "plenty of patients and clients who would testify to this process" is not exactly the definition of "empirical"... but what the heck. Why don't you post the evidence first and then we can go over it and see whether it's not a whole lot more glad-handling bullshit.

[GodSlayer]

I'm afraid you will not find evidence based anything on this because politics and power would not allow for that. However, clinical evidence I can give you. I have plenty of that. That may be too empirical for you, possibly. Yet I have plenty of patients and clients who would testify to this process being highly beneficial and useful for them.

You will not find this evidence from anyone on the planet. You'll be searching till you die. There is a science that supports this but it's too challenging to be accepted so easily which is way it sounds like faith healing and whatever else you might propose it to be.

did you only come here to reassure us that it would be a mistake to take any of your claims seriously?

if so, your work here is done.

[Jim S]

I know I'm full of bullshit. You're not telling me anything I don't already know...

Why are y'all still going on?

[Skulker]

I know I'm full of bullshit. You're not telling me anything I don't already know...

Why are y'all still going on?

^ This 

Q.E.D.

[Halleyscomet/Wakefield]

Here is a link of a physicist who explains quantum entanglement as I have described it: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/spooky-action-distance.html

And yet you have already made it clear that you don't even know what the word "quantum" means. Perhaps basing a medical philosophy upon a PBS special about subatomic particles is a poor choice, especially when it's clear you didn't understand the science.

You keep discussing quantum physics as if it supported your claims. It does not. You have yet to establish in any way shape of form how your vague and deeply flawed misunderstanding of quantum physics has anything to do with cancer in humans. You're tried to use you gibberish mush-mosh of sciency sounding words to craft a stillborn metaphor for the human mind, but any drunk first year philosophy student could o the same.

You have offered shoddy philosophy and asked us to accept it as if it were a truth. The real world does not work that way, Without facts and evidence any nut job can make any bullshit claim they want and expect people to believe it.

You will not find this evidence from anyone on the planet. You'll be searching till you die. There is a science that supports this but it's too challenging to be accepted so easily which is way it sounds like faith healing and whatever else you might propose it to be.

Your ego is the only impressive thing about you. Your complete inability to comprehend the need for evidence and the what's currently theorized about quantum physics does not mean it's beyond human comprehension, just that it's beyond YOUR comprehension. The fact that you are not as intelligent as Einstein does not mean only an alien could understand what Einstein wrote.

You have no facts to back up your claims so you're trying to mock people for asking for evidence. That's not the behavior of an honest man, but of a liar and a con artist. You have yet to give us any reason to believe anything you're saying. So far, all you've done is depict yourself as a con artist.

[Halleyscomet/Wakefield]

We've been trolled by a bullshit artist.

Who happens to charge money for his bull. 

ETA: He may or may not be charging for his cancer advice - it seems he's still a player in the 'wellness' market, but I'm not sure what exactly this involves, although his website still advertises seminars (not currently available, apparently) http://parallelpractise.com/seminars/

It looks like the con man is also using us for inspiration for his facebook posts:

https://www.facebook.com/parallelpractise

[Halleyscomet/Wakefield]

He posted amusing explanation for back pain to Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/parallelpractise/posts/318398084870277

People who tend to get back pain that persists and doesn't alleviate with any form of outside support are not supporting themselves or their true values. The spinal column is the part of the human body that supports you and protects the spinal cord, which serves to provide input to your brain and receive feedback from the world around you. When you choose to support other peoples beliefs and values to the degree that you are unable to support yourself, you will create pain inside of your body to alert you to this reality. It would be wise to see how it would serve you to support who you are, your values and your vision or mission in life. The sooner you take these steps, the quicker you can transform your pain.

Believing his irrational ramblings about the cause of cancer would require me to set aside evidence, logic and science. I would have to discard empirical thinking within the realm of medicine, chemistry and biology. This means I would be unable to support myself.

This means, according to Schreeuwer himself, if I were to believe his scientifically laughable claims about cancer, I would get back pain!

[Halleyscomet/Wakefield]

Another site affiliated with this quack:

http://www.humandetour.com/

[GodSlayer]

https://www.facebook.com/parallelpractise

managed to find one man 'liked' to his page!
looks like the other 199 are women.

now I regret talking in elevators.

[JuniorSpaceman]

https://www.facebook.com/parallelpractise

managed to find one man 'liked' to his page!
looks like the other 199 are women.

now I regret talking in elevators.

Seriously, you're going to turn this into a gender war?