Author Topic: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread  (Read 3372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pandamonium

  • Skeptical Beer Inspector
  • Global Moderator
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *****
  • Posts: 28690
  • I'm feeling all right
    • Oodles of Doodles - My blog
Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« on: Jan 04, 2012, 09:12:12 PM »
For books that you want to talk about, but not necessarily make a new thread for. List thread is right here.

Rillon's Law

Panda is smart!
"I'm hungry but it's ok that's why we've got a confessions stand."

Online Calinthalus

  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Posts: 5304
    • My Page
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #1 on: Jan 05, 2012, 06:51:28 AM »
Thanks Panda.

This year, I'm going to move forward on my quest to read the entire Discworld series in order.  Likewise, in honor of the passing of Anne McCaffrey, I'm re-reading the Brains & Brawn series and might go on to re-read the Dragonriders of Pern this year.
"I think computer viruses should count as life. Maybe it says something about human nature, that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. Talk about creating life in our own image."
--Stephen Hawking

Offline stonesean

  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Posts: 5780
  • Dumb sailor on the Sea of Awesome
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #2 on: Jan 05, 2012, 08:34:43 AM »
Holy Crap!

Anne McCaffrey died!?   :'(

So, the last living female Grand Master is Ursula K. Le Guin?
Well.  There it is.

Offline pandamonium

  • Skeptical Beer Inspector
  • Global Moderator
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *****
  • Posts: 28690
  • I'm feeling all right
    • Oodles of Doodles - My blog
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #3 on: Jan 14, 2012, 07:04:50 PM »
By far my latest start date.  :(

A1. Stranger in a Strange Land
Excellent choice, Skeptress. It's really interesting.

Rillon's Law

Panda is smart!
"I'm hungry but it's ok that's why we've got a confessions stand."

Offline stonesean

  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Posts: 5780
  • Dumb sailor on the Sea of Awesome
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #4 on: Jan 15, 2012, 07:14:16 AM »
So last week I read "Bossypants" by Tina Fey, and "Is Everyone Hanging Out Without Me?" by Mindy Kaling.

My wife got em on her kindle, and I snagged it from her.

Fey's book is interesting to me as a long time fan of Second City and Saturday Night Live.  (of which she was a large part the last couple decades) Kaling's book is more just sort of a set of funny essays, some which deal with "The Office" and some which are just funny stories.

I highly recommend "Bossypants" and if you are bored and looking for a laugh, you could do far worse than "Is Everyone Hanging Out......"
Well.  There it is.

Offline Guillermo

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 3453
  • (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #5 on: Jan 27, 2012, 09:56:27 AM »
I want to make a list, but I have limited reading time, and on top of that I am a slow reader. :(
My sights are now on Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan. I was going to read Through the Looking Glass, but I am no longer interested after being disappointment with Alice in Wonderland.

Offline Avarice

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #6 on: Jan 27, 2012, 02:39:58 PM »
I'm listening to Hitch-22 on tape right now. It's 15 glorious disks long.

I always liked Christopher Hitchens, but he lived a much more depressing life than I realized. That stuff about how his mother died was rough IMO.
Who are you and why are you reading my signature?

Offline pandamonium

  • Skeptical Beer Inspector
  • Global Moderator
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *****
  • Posts: 28690
  • I'm feeling all right
    • Oodles of Doodles - My blog
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #7 on: Jan 28, 2012, 07:04:45 PM »
I'm listening to Hitch-22 on tape right now. It's 15 glorious disks long.
They still make those?

Rillon's Law

Panda is smart!
"I'm hungry but it's ok that's why we've got a confessions stand."

Offline Avarice

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #8 on: Jan 28, 2012, 07:27:22 PM »
I meant on CD.

I'm just used to calling audiobooks "books on tape". Must be a midwestern thing.
Who are you and why are you reading my signature?

Offline pandamonium

  • Skeptical Beer Inspector
  • Global Moderator
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *****
  • Posts: 28690
  • I'm feeling all right
    • Oodles of Doodles - My blog
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #9 on: Jan 29, 2012, 02:08:54 AM »
ah. i called them that up until a couple years ago. i actually have several books on audicassette. i haven't listened to them all, but i should.

Rillon's Law

Panda is smart!
"I'm hungry but it's ok that's why we've got a confessions stand."

Online stretcher

  • Seasoned Contributor
  • ****
  • Posts: 748
  • I am become pants
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #10 on: Jan 29, 2012, 03:37:02 AM »
I randomly purchased The Woman In Black because I wanted a ghost story. Later I saw Daniel Radcliffe on some talk show promoting the film adaptation. So, cool, I thought - first I can finish the book then see the movie with one of my favorite actors. Booyaakasha.

The Discworld series is something I want to get started on but it's intimidating. And since I'm a completionist it scares me - all those books. The writing style and humor, is it similar to Pratchett's other works like Good Omens?

Offline Guillermo

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 3453
  • (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #11 on: Jan 29, 2012, 06:57:55 AM »
The writing style and humor, is it similar to Pratchett's other works like Good Omens?

After reading two books from discworld and the sandman series. I have noticed that Good Omen combines both styles. You can barely notice the contribution of both authors. I think the styles are slightly different.

Offline David E.

  • Incorrigible
  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 17269
  • Trying to be less misanthropic.
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #12 on: Jan 29, 2012, 07:52:48 PM »
I randomly purchased The Woman In Black because I wanted a ghost story. Later I saw Daniel Radcliffe on some talk show promoting the film adaptation. So, cool, I thought - first I can finish the book then see the movie with one of my favorite actors. Booyaakasha.


Oh, I will have to check that book out.  The movie trailer looked very good.  Old House Horror always gets to me. 
Nobody these days holds the written word in such high esteem as police states do.  What statistic allows one to identify the Nations where Literature enjoys true consideration better than the sums appropriated for controlling and suppressing it.
Italo Calvino.

Online Calinthalus

  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Posts: 5304
    • My Page
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #13 on: Feb 08, 2012, 12:59:07 PM »
I just finished Superfreakonomics.  I didn't like it as well as the first one...except:
(click to show/hide)
"I think computer viruses should count as life. Maybe it says something about human nature, that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. Talk about creating life in our own image."
--Stephen Hawking

Online Calinthalus

  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Posts: 5304
    • My Page
Re: Books for 2012 - Discussion Thread
« Reply #14 on: Feb 16, 2012, 02:18:12 PM »
Just finished Breakfast of Champions by Vonnegut.

To quote Simon Tam, "This must be what going mad feels like."
"I think computer viruses should count as life. Maybe it says something about human nature, that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. Talk about creating life in our own image."
--Stephen Hawking

 

personate-rain