I am on topic since this was debated at length in today's podcast so I don't really see the problem. I can't reply to everything and sometimes threads get so bogged down with extraneous stuff that it is helpful to make a clean break, start over, get a fresh start.
Ok, then, I guess Ill repeat from the previous thread...
4) Syntax is insufficient for semantics
This is an unsupported assertion. It is critical to your conclusion yet you have provided no logic or evidence to show that it is that case, youve simply included it as a premise. Please elaborate.
(Also, point 2 is based on the assumption on point 4)