Author Topic: Episode #355  (Read 4003 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline no-en

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 228
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #15 on: May 05, 2012, 07:25:58 PM »
.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2012, 12:12:03 AM by no-en »

Online seaotter

  • Drunkenly yelling LITTLE WING!
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *
  • Posts: 28705
  • My homunculus is an atheist.
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #16 on: May 05, 2012, 07:32:55 PM »
Seems to me your saying they don't do it now therefore it can't be done. I wish we had a neurologist we could ask.

Which brains deal in semantics? Lizards? Does a snail just use syntax?
« Last Edit: May 05, 2012, 07:38:37 PM by seaotter »
"There is no use trying," said Alice; "one can't believe impossible things." Lewis Carroll

Offline Caffiene

  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Posts: 5105
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #17 on: May 05, 2012, 07:45:23 PM »
no-en, if you want to argue machine sentience (again), might I suggest you go back to one of the previous threads (such as this one) where there are already many responses to your points that havent been addressed.

Theres not much point bogging down this thread repeating the same points that were made in that one which you havent responded to yet.
"Bombarded by health-giving electric atoms!"

Online seaotter

  • Drunkenly yelling LITTLE WING!
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *
  • Posts: 28705
  • My homunculus is an atheist.
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #18 on: May 05, 2012, 07:47:57 PM »
Sloths are cool, and I'm drunk. Correction, I'm science!
"There is no use trying," said Alice; "one can't believe impossible things." Lewis Carroll

Offline no-en

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 228
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #19 on: May 05, 2012, 07:48:34 PM »
.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2012, 12:12:14 AM by no-en »

Online seaotter

  • Drunkenly yelling LITTLE WING!
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *
  • Posts: 28705
  • My homunculus is an atheist.
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #20 on: May 05, 2012, 07:49:44 PM »
You are hi freaking larious. I mean sad.
"There is no use trying," said Alice; "one can't believe impossible things." Lewis Carroll

Offline no-en

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 228
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #21 on: May 05, 2012, 07:54:46 PM »
.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2012, 12:12:22 AM by no-en »

Online seaotter

  • Drunkenly yelling LITTLE WING!
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *
  • Posts: 28705
  • My homunculus is an atheist.
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #22 on: May 05, 2012, 07:55:59 PM »
Ok case closed. ::)

Presumably we had unconscious minds before they evolved right?
« Last Edit: May 05, 2012, 07:59:38 PM by seaotter »
"There is no use trying," said Alice; "one can't believe impossible things." Lewis Carroll

Offline Caffiene

  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Posts: 5105
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #23 on: May 05, 2012, 07:59:19 PM »
I am on topic since this was debated at length in today's podcast so I don't really see the problem. I can't reply to everything and sometimes threads get so bogged down with extraneous stuff that it is helpful to make a clean break, start over, get a fresh start.

Ok, then, I guess Ill repeat from the previous thread...

4) Syntax is insufficient for semantics

This is an unsupported assertion. It is critical to your conclusion yet you have provided no logic or evidence to show that it is that case, youve simply included it as a premise. Please elaborate.

(Also, point 2 is based on the assumption on point 4)
"Bombarded by health-giving electric atoms!"

Online seaotter

  • Drunkenly yelling LITTLE WING!
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *
  • Posts: 28705
  • My homunculus is an atheist.
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2012, 08:00:55 PM »
Presumably we had unconscious minds befor they were conscious. Right?
« Last Edit: May 05, 2012, 08:09:50 PM by seaotter »
"There is no use trying," said Alice; "one can't believe impossible things." Lewis Carroll

Online Chew

  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 10257
  • Let's gut it!
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #25 on: May 05, 2012, 08:31:23 PM »

Aren't you the same poster who crapped on skeptics for being dogmatic?

If I argue that 2 + 2 = 4 am I being dogmatic?

Are there statements that are true?

Is asserting the truth of an argument dogmatism?

Is everything relative?

Are there objective truths?

Is stating an objective truth being dogmatic?

But you're not saying 2 + 2 =4; you're saying computers will never be conscious.

Stating a subjective opinion as if it were objective truth is dogmatic.
"It is difficult to say what truth is, but sometimes it is easy to recognize falsehood." -Albert Einstein

Offline no-en

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 228
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #26 on: May 05, 2012, 08:46:42 PM »
.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2012, 12:12:34 AM by no-en »

Online seaotter

  • Drunkenly yelling LITTLE WING!
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *
  • Posts: 28705
  • My homunculus is an atheist.
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #27 on: May 05, 2012, 08:50:52 PM »
Presumably we had unconscious minds befor they were conscious. Right?

I'm beginning to think yourE ignoring this for some reason.

Do I detect a backing off of the dogma with:

Quote
Syntax by itself is not constitutive of semantics nor by itself sufficient to guarantee the presence of semantics.

And yes I realize I've just given you a way to ignore the unconscious question again.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2012, 08:55:12 PM by seaotter »
"There is no use trying," said Alice; "one can't believe impossible things." Lewis Carroll

Offline no-en

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 228
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #28 on: May 05, 2012, 09:02:25 PM »
.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2012, 12:12:43 AM by no-en »

Online seaotter

  • Drunkenly yelling LITTLE WING!
  • Planetary Skeptic
  • *
  • Posts: 28705
  • My homunculus is an atheist.
Re: Episode #355
« Reply #29 on: May 05, 2012, 09:06:04 PM »
Snicker. What's the POS podcast? This is not the first time you have washed your hands of this place. But really you didn't have to run away to ignore my question.

How the hell did we become semantic from syntactic if it's impossible?

Looks to me the problem is in axiom 3.
"There is no use trying," said Alice; "one can't believe impossible things." Lewis Carroll

 

personate-rain