The reader chose to read it a way favorable to their opposition to TF.
I guess you completely missed where I stated:
I don't know this guy from a hole in the ground
I didn't/don't have any particular "opposition to TF" or whatever his complaint is about the FTB. I wasn't even talking about any of that. The only thing I've commented on is his specific wording regarding what he was referring to as being "off the deep end".
But hey, don't let me interrupt your presumptuous mind-reading schtick.....this stuff is priceless
I thought I'd just responded to that, oh well.
Why don't you stop being condescending, presumptuous, and un-yielding to take asecond and consider what she's saying and have an actual.conversation. You disagree on something; fine. Discuss it.
I did discuss it thanks and I accepted seaotter's criticism.
I considered what she was saying, it was grounded in a misreading that was based on a logical fallacy.
Initially the criticism of TF was shown to be baseless so she retreated to a critique that he should have been clearer.
Having accepted seaotter's point, your subjective self-superior bullying crap is bullshit.Take your own advice.