Author Topic: PZ Myers claims "a substantial number of skeptics" are scientific racists  (Read 1257 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gmalivuk

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1199
    • http://gmalivuk.livejournal.com
Unless you're incapable of continuing the discussion because I said Dawkins was racist, I don't see how my calling him racist is supposed to be an attempt to avoid frank discussion.

Pretending Islamophobia and anti-Semitism aren't forms of racism doesn't actually make it so, especially given the history of conflating Judaism in particular with race rather than merely religious belief.

(Just like it's still racist if you say, "I don't think Black people are inferior because of their race, it's just that their ~culture~ has serious problems.")

Racial profiling is another good example. We may have hard facts that certain races are more likely to commit certain crimes, and some of us think it's racist to use that information to target people and some think it's a moral imperative because it theoretically will lead to more effective policing.
That would be an example of pseudoscientific racism, incidentally, because the actual research shows that racial profiling does not, in fact, lead to more effective policing, and so it's a case of letting one's racist beliefs overshadow the facts.

In principle scientific racism (as in, the sort that doesn't require any pseudoscience) could hinge on something like statistical differences in types of intelligence between different racial groups. Those differences may in fact be real and verifiable, but that wouldn't make discrimination or bias based on race any less racist. The fact that a lot of so-called scientific racism has in the past been based on what's actually pseudoscience doesn't mean it's impossible for such a thing to exist, because racism is still bad regardless of what the science happens to say.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2017, 11:14:24 PM by gmalivuk »
The world is so exquisite with so much love and moral depth, that there is no reason to deceive ourselves with pretty stories for which there's little good evidence. Far better...is to look death in the eye and to be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent opportunity that life provides.

Online Andrew Clunn

  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 14813
  • Aspiring Super Villain
You've established standards where one cannot criticize a religion without also attacking any ethnic groups that predominantly practice that faith.  It's a stupid standard that does make frank discussion impossible.
You want data?  My pie charts are made with a secret family recipe, my relationship charts stay committed even through tough times, and my line charts will get get high as fuck!

Offline gmalivuk

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1199
    • http://gmalivuk.livejournal.com
You've established standards where one cannot criticize a religion without also attacking any ethnic groups that predominantly practice that faith.  It's a stupid standard that does make frank discussion impossible.
If you want to talk about people who only criticize religious beliefs themselves, without holding double standards or otherwise letting that criticism get mixed up with their racism, then feel free to bring up such a person.

But Dawkins was the one we were discussing.
The world is so exquisite with so much love and moral depth, that there is no reason to deceive ourselves with pretty stories for which there's little good evidence. Far better...is to look death in the eye and to be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent opportunity that life provides.

Online Andrew Clunn

  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 14813
  • Aspiring Super Villain
Not engaging with my actual point.  Making assertions without evidence and claiming they are facts.
You want data?  My pie charts are made with a secret family recipe, my relationship charts stay committed even through tough times, and my line charts will get get high as fuck!

Offline gmalivuk

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1199
    • http://gmalivuk.livejournal.com
Which "actual point" would that be, exactly?

tbh I pretty much stopped taking you seriously after you claimed I was "triggered" by frank discussion.
The world is so exquisite with so much love and moral depth, that there is no reason to deceive ourselves with pretty stories for which there's little good evidence. Far better...is to look death in the eye and to be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent opportunity that life provides.

Offline stands2reason

  • Empiricist, Positivist, Militant Agnostic
  • Reef Tank Owner
  • *********
  • Posts: 9613
Or are you trying to claim that Islamophobia isn't a kind of racism simply because there are Muslims who aren't from the stereotypical ethnic groups associated with Islam?

Islam isn't a race. In fact, it doesn't even have super-representation from any single ethnicity or nationality. Islam is truly multicultural and factionalized (and sectarian) just like Christianity—arguably even more so.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2017, 10:38:18 AM by stands2reason »

Offline Quetzalcoatl

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 2375
And absolutely Muslim often colloquially means people of a certain ethnic group.

Oh really? I once had an Assyrian colleague, with background from a Muslim-majority country. She'd slap you in the face if you call her a Muslim.
"Large skepticism leads to large understanding. Small skepticism leads to small understanding. No skepticism leads to no understanding." - Xi Zhi

Offline gmalivuk

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1199
    • http://gmalivuk.livejournal.com
So? That a colloquialism is inaccurate or offensive doesn't mean it isn't real.
The world is so exquisite with so much love and moral depth, that there is no reason to deceive ourselves with pretty stories for which there's little good evidence. Far better...is to look death in the eye and to be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent opportunity that life provides.

Online Ah.hell

  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 10338
Ok, xenophobic then. 

Online Andrew Clunn

  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 14813
  • Aspiring Super Villain
So? That a colloquialism is inaccurate or offensive doesn't mean it isn't real.

They're called words.  They have meanings.  If a single word has multiple meanings, then it's important to know which is being used in order to understand what's being said.  You don't get to have it both ways simultaneously.  This should be obvious, but since you're doing everything you can to get the interpretation you want, apparently not.
You want data?  My pie charts are made with a secret family recipe, my relationship charts stay committed even through tough times, and my line charts will get get high as fuck!

Offline gmalivuk

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1199
    • http://gmalivuk.livejournal.com
Acknowledging that words have connotations as well as denotations, and that associations can exist even when they're factually inaccurate, is not "having it both ways simultaneously".
The world is so exquisite with so much love and moral depth, that there is no reason to deceive ourselves with pretty stories for which there's little good evidence. Far better...is to look death in the eye and to be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent opportunity that life provides.

Offline Redamare

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 2930
All this mental gymnastics to make criticism of Islam into racism is offensively idiotic.

I think some of Harris's rhetoric is a waste of breath rather than a lone voice of reason. That doesn't make it racism.

I also support affirmative action, but opposing it isn't racism, either.
"redamare has kicked this thread's ass" -champagnej

Certainty is the enemy of wisdom.

--RED-uh-MAR-ay--

Offline Quetzalcoatl

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 2375
I also support affirmative action, but opposing it isn't racism, either.

Thank you. :)
"Large skepticism leads to large understanding. Small skepticism leads to small understanding. No skepticism leads to no understanding." - Xi Zhi

Offline gmalivuk

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1199
    • http://gmalivuk.livejournal.com
Who said all criticism of Islam was racist?
The world is so exquisite with so much love and moral depth, that there is no reason to deceive ourselves with pretty stories for which there's little good evidence. Far better...is to look death in the eye and to be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent opportunity that life provides.

 

personate-rain