Author Topic: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")  (Read 1515 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Drunken Idaho

  • Reef Tank Owner
  • *********
  • Posts: 9162
  • Comrade Questions
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #30 on: March 10, 2017, 10:33:59 AM »
I don't believe that you invented non beliefism.

This is what non-beliefism is about. Don't believe.

Why do you make claims which nobody should believe?

I don't make any claims, but non-beliefism is about, not surprisingly, not believing.
So, no one should believe.

You claimed that you are the inventor of non beliefism.

Strikes me as hypocritical to make a claim which necessitates belief in the same post that you seem to advocate for non-belief as an ethos.

It does not necessitate belief.
You don't need belief to observe probabilities.

You claim to have invented non-beliefism, not to "have likely been the inventor." Your claim--hypocritically--demands belief.
Strange women lying in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government.

Offline seamas

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1723
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #31 on: March 10, 2017, 11:20:42 AM »
I don't believe the OP one bit.

Offline ProgrammingGodJordan

  • Off to a Start
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • I am the creator/founder of "nonbeliefism.com".
    • "Non beliefism" = Atheism minus Theism
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #32 on: March 10, 2017, 11:25:45 AM »
I don't believe that you invented non beliefism.

This is what non-beliefism is about. Don't believe.

Why do you make claims which nobody should believe?

I don't make any claims, but non-beliefism is about, not surprisingly, not believing.
So, no one should believe.

You claimed that you are the inventor of non beliefism.

Strikes me as hypocritical to make a claim which necessitates belief in the same post that you seem to advocate for non-belief as an ethos.

It does not necessitate belief.
You don't need belief to observe probabilities.

You claim to have invented non-beliefism, not to "have likely been the inventor." Your claim--hypocritically--demands belief.

Life is already a sequence of probabilities. (See uncertainty principle)
I tend not deeply use adverbs such as probably, as it renders as redundancy.
I do however use the adverb throughout http://nonbeliefism.com.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2017, 11:28:17 AM by ProgrammingGodJordan »
"Non beliefism" is probably atheism's successor. ("Non beliefism" = Atheism minus Theism)
I am the creator/founder of "non beliefism":
http://nonbeliefism.com
 
 
I am a casual body-builder & software engineer:
https://www.facebook.com/ProgrammingGodJordan

Offline ProgrammingGodJordan

  • Off to a Start
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • I am the creator/founder of "nonbeliefism.com".
    • "Non beliefism" = Atheism minus Theism
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #33 on: March 10, 2017, 11:26:24 AM »
I don't believe the OP one bit.

I would not have you believing anything.
"Non beliefism" is probably atheism's successor. ("Non beliefism" = Atheism minus Theism)
I am the creator/founder of "non beliefism":
http://nonbeliefism.com
 
 
I am a casual body-builder & software engineer:
https://www.facebook.com/ProgrammingGodJordan

Offline Drunken Idaho

  • Reef Tank Owner
  • *********
  • Posts: 9162
  • Comrade Questions
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #34 on: March 10, 2017, 11:40:27 AM »
You claim to have invented non-beliefism, not to "have likely been the inventor." Your claim--hypocritically--demands belief.

Life is already a sequence of probabilities. (See uncertainty principle)
I tend not deeply use adverbs such as probably, as it renders as redundancy.
I do however use the adverb throughout http://nonbeliefism.com.

Of course it is.

But you're dancing around the issue I'm pointing out: your original post asks its readers to believe your claim:

I am its inventor.

That's a claim that requires belief, and you're asking the readers of your post to believe it, by stating it as if it is true.

This is hypocritical, as it is antithetical to the very ethos you claim to have invented.
Strange women lying in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government.

Offline seamas

  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1723
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #35 on: March 10, 2017, 12:01:11 PM »
Unbelievable.


Offline Henning

  • Official Forum Artist
  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Posts: 4856
  • Mad "Liker"
    • Anomalina
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #36 on: March 10, 2017, 12:37:19 PM »
I don't believe the OP one bit.

I would not have you believing anything.


Good. We don't.
Next thread.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. --Voltaire
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence. -- Hitchens.

Offline ProgrammingGodJordan

  • Off to a Start
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • I am the creator/founder of "nonbeliefism.com".
    • "Non beliefism" = Atheism minus Theism
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #37 on: March 10, 2017, 01:22:17 PM »
You claim to have invented non-beliefism, not to "have likely been the inventor." Your claim--hypocritically--demands belief.

Life is already a sequence of probabilities. (See uncertainty principle)
I tend not deeply use adverbs such as probably, as it renders as redundancy.
I do however use the adverb throughout http://nonbeliefism.com.

Of course it is.

But you're dancing around the issue I'm pointing out: your original post asks its readers to believe your claim:

I am its inventor.

That's a claim that requires belief, and you're asking the readers of your post to believe it, by stating it as if it is true.

This is hypocritical, as it is antithetical to the very ethos you claim to have invented.


You may fancy believing things, but don't impose your nature on others.

Whether or not I am its inventor, is probable rather than not, and so, it shall be observed as such.

Instead of the above probability writing, your mind went straight ahead to belief. It appears you fancy belief, (your mind cherry picked belief, where other possibilities were available) and that opposes 'non beliefism'.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2017, 01:24:25 PM by ProgrammingGodJordan »
"Non beliefism" is probably atheism's successor. ("Non beliefism" = Atheism minus Theism)
I am the creator/founder of "non beliefism":
http://nonbeliefism.com
 
 
I am a casual body-builder & software engineer:
https://www.facebook.com/ProgrammingGodJordan

Offline ProgrammingGodJordan

  • Off to a Start
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • I am the creator/founder of "nonbeliefism.com".
    • "Non beliefism" = Atheism minus Theism
"Non beliefism" is probably atheism's successor. ("Non beliefism" = Atheism minus Theism)
I am the creator/founder of "non beliefism":
http://nonbeliefism.com
 
 
I am a casual body-builder & software engineer:
https://www.facebook.com/ProgrammingGodJordan

Online Louie

  • Actually three chimps tag-teaming a keyboard.
  • Global Moderator
  • Double-Plus Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1984
  • Let the elephant make everything kushtee.
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #39 on: March 10, 2017, 01:56:15 PM »
OKAY, that's it, this guy has officially driven me into believing in Jesus. I'm on board for all of it, the whole shebang - virgin birth, lepers, walking on lakes. Someone get me one of those cookies and some wine, cheers.
"It can't end like this. Tell them I said something." - Pancho Villa's last words (1923).

Offline teethering

  • 37% better than Slick
  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 10702
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #40 on: March 10, 2017, 02:00:55 PM »
OKAY, that's it, this guy has officially driven me into believing in Jesus. I'm on board for all of it, the whole shebang - virgin birth, lepers, walking on lakes. Someone get me one of those cookies and some wine, cheers.

Ironically, I don't believe you.  I do believe in wine and cookies though.  Maybe some crackers with some delicious cheese and figs.  A little charcuterie.  Maybe some olive oil and sourdough...

I do believe I'm ready for lunch.

Offline Belgarath

  • Forum Sugar Daddy
  • Technical Administrator
  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • *****
  • Posts: 10683
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #41 on: March 10, 2017, 02:22:10 PM »
I still want to know if he's going to consult with Otis Eugene Ray, their writing styles are hauntingly similar.....
#notarealskeptic

Offline Drunken Idaho

  • Reef Tank Owner
  • *********
  • Posts: 9162
  • Comrade Questions
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #42 on: March 10, 2017, 02:33:44 PM »
(click to show/hide)

You may fancy believing things, but don't impose your nature on others.

Whether or not I am its inventor, is probable rather than not, and so, it shall be observed as such.

Instead of the above probability writing, your mind went straight ahead to belief. It appears you fancy belief, (your mind cherry picked belief, where other possibilities were available) and that opposes 'non beliefism'.

Aw, cute. I catch you in a logical inconsistency (asking people in your OP to believe that you invented this ideology of non-belief), and in response, you childishly sputter the equivalent of, "I know you are but what am I."
Strange women lying in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government.

Offline teethering

  • 37% better than Slick
  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 10702
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #43 on: March 10, 2017, 02:34:08 PM »
Yeah, this in particular is very familiar

Quote
I am wiser than any god or scientist, for I have squared the circle and cubed Earth's sphere, thus I have created 4 simultaneous separate 24 hour days within a 4-corner (as in a 4-corner classroom) rotation of Earth. See for yourself the absolute proof.

Offline Drunken Idaho

  • Reef Tank Owner
  • *********
  • Posts: 9162
  • Comrade Questions
Re: Why belief is non-necessary (written by inventor of "non beliefism")
« Reply #44 on: March 10, 2017, 02:36:50 PM »
Yeah, this in particular is very familiar

Quote
I am wiser than any god or scientist, for I have squared the circle and cubed Earth's sphere, thus I have created 4 simultaneous separate 24 hour days within a 4-corner (as in a 4-corner classroom) rotation of Earth. See for yourself the absolute proof.

I'm sure this hyper-advanced brain simply has trouble communicating with us of such average intelligence, because his words read like that of an angsty, barely-literate juvenile.
Strange women lying in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government.

 

personate-rain