Author Topic: Episode #65  (Read 20487 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JHGRedekop

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 160
    • http://77track7.blogspot.com
Face on Mars
« Reply #15 on: Oct 21, 2006, 06:50:21 PM »
I can't remember who it was who suggested doing up an "Ass on Mars" website, but the great animated TV series Invader Zim beat you to it! In the episode Battle of the Planets, the alien Zim discovers that the Face on Mars is a piloting module that lets you fly Mars around the solar system like a rocket. His nemesis Dib (a UFO nut) sets out to foil him using the mysterious (but little known) "Butt on Mercury". Most of the rest of the episode is a hilarious chase scene with Mars and Mercury winging around the solar system like some Velikovskian fantasy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Planets_(Invader_Zim)

Offline cosmicvagabond

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 2203
Episode #65
« Reply #16 on: Oct 21, 2006, 08:54:48 PM »
This week's puzzle answer is:

Highlight here --->  The human palm
Bold ideas, unjustified anticipations, and speculative thoughts are our only means for interpreting nature... Those among us who are unwilling to expose their ideas to the hazard of refutation do not take part in the scientific game.    ---Karl Popper, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery"

Offline bigbad256

  • Off to a Start
  • *
  • Posts: 22
    • http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/changelingp/home.html
Episode #65
« Reply #17 on: Oct 22, 2006, 12:24:47 AM »
I don't know about you guys but to me this does NOT look like
Quote
Another shattered mechanical housing from the interior of Shorty Crater



it looks like a giant moon-lobster trying to hide from the camera under a rock. You can only see its red body and tail poking out towards the left of the image. One claw is seen also.

Giant lobsters ... mmmm... now there is a reason to go back to the moon. All I need now is a couple of candles, a bottle of bubbly and a date.
quot;Not only is there no God, but try finding a plumber on Sunday." W. Allen

Offline Clintsc9

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 141
Episode #65
« Reply #18 on: Oct 22, 2006, 01:27:14 AM »
Totally agree with cosmicvagabond re his answer to the puzzle.

Congrats.  You beat me to it.
Clint Lovell
--------------
Why does confirmation bias always happen to me?

Offline cosmicvagabond

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 2203
Episode #65
« Reply #19 on: Oct 22, 2006, 01:45:48 AM »
Quote from: "Clintsc9"
Totally agree with cosmicvagabond re his answer to the puzzle.

Congrats.  You beat me to it.


Thanks. I probably just have more time to kill right now than you do.  :wink:
Bold ideas, unjustified anticipations, and speculative thoughts are our only means for interpreting nature... Those among us who are unwilling to expose their ideas to the hazard of refutation do not take part in the scientific game.    ---Karl Popper, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery"

Offline bigbad256

  • Off to a Start
  • *
  • Posts: 22
    • http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/changelingp/home.html
Episode #65
« Reply #20 on: Oct 22, 2006, 07:42:00 AM »
good call on the palm cosmic. gotta be right.  :)
quot;Not only is there no God, but try finding a plumber on Sunday." W. Allen

Offline reed

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 134
Episode #65
« Reply #21 on: Oct 22, 2006, 09:29:08 AM »
Quote from: "bigbad256"


it looks like a giant moon-lobster trying to hide from the camera under a rock. You can only see its red body and tail poking out towards the left of the image. One claw is seen also.

Giant lobsters ... mmmm... now there is a reason to go back to the moon. All I need now is a couple of candles, a bottle of bubbly and a date.

You're probably right, bigbad.  Right above the moon-lobster, they're giving you the thumbs-up.   :)

Offline cosmicvagabond

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 2203
Episode #65
« Reply #22 on: Oct 22, 2006, 12:49:22 PM »
Quote from: "bigbad256"
good call on the palm cosmic. gotta be right.  :)


Thank you...where's my prize? What? There's no prize? Aw bummer, man. :(
Bold ideas, unjustified anticipations, and speculative thoughts are our only means for interpreting nature... Those among us who are unwilling to expose their ideas to the hazard of refutation do not take part in the scientific game.    ---Karl Popper, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery"

Offline Clintsc9

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 141
Episode #65
« Reply #23 on: Oct 22, 2006, 04:22:44 PM »
There is a prize Cosmic.  I got one for the last puzzle.  I got a mention on the podcast.  You can't get a better prize than that.  8)
Clint Lovell
--------------
Why does confirmation bias always happen to me?

Offline Clintsc9

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 141
Episode #65
« Reply #24 on: Oct 22, 2006, 04:26:28 PM »
Quote from: "bigbad256"
All I need now is a couple of candles, a bottle of bubbly and a date.

I'm sure of you looked around, you would find rocks that looked like candles, bottles of bubbly and dates.   Enjoy.  :lol:
Clint Lovell
--------------
Why does confirmation bias always happen to me?

Offline JD

  • Seasoned Contributor
  • ****
  • Posts: 563
Episode #65
« Reply #25 on: Oct 22, 2006, 05:53:26 PM »
Two date rocks, please.
roblem with the forum?  email me: leykial *at* yahoo *dot* com
Turn on, tune in, drop out, and shut the hell up, hippie.
"I'm a pretty good researcher ." - Neal Adams

Offline cosmicvagabond

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 2203
Episode #65
« Reply #26 on: Oct 23, 2006, 01:50:54 AM »
Quote from: "Clintsc9"
There is a prize Cosmic.  I got one for the last puzzle.  I got a mention on the podcast.  You can't get a better prize than that.  8)


I was thinking more along the lines of a free brain transplant fron Dr. N. Mine is getting a little feeble in my old age.  :wink:
Bold ideas, unjustified anticipations, and speculative thoughts are our only means for interpreting nature... Those among us who are unwilling to expose their ideas to the hazard of refutation do not take part in the scientific game.    ---Karl Popper, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery"

Offline Erik

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 121
Episode #65
« Reply #27 on: Oct 23, 2006, 12:09:59 PM »
I thought I heard it said that the nuclei of atoms are held together by the weak nuclear force. That would be the strong nuclear force that holds the nucleus of the atom together. Although the weak nuclear force is needed to build stable atoms with a large number of protons, it doesn't actually hold things together.

Offline JHGRedekop

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 160
    • http://77track7.blogspot.com
Episode #65
« Reply #28 on: Oct 23, 2006, 12:16:33 PM »
Quote from: "Erik"
I thought I heard it said that the nuclei of atoms are held together by the weak nuclear force. That would be the strong nuclear force that holds the nucleus of the atom together. Although the weak nuclear force is needed to build stable atoms with a large number of protons, it doesn't actually hold things together.


This is my understanding as well -- the strong force is responsible for holding nuclei together, and the weak force governs beta decay and some other interactions.

Since the strong force is very short-ranged, large nuclei become more and more unstable as the protons near the edges feel less and less of the strong force.

Offline Steven Novella

  • SGU Panel Member
  • Well Established
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • http://www.theskepticsguide.org
Episode #65
« Reply #29 on: Oct 23, 2006, 04:44:44 PM »
Correct, I screwed that up. I was thinking that the strong force is what hold quarks together into protons and neutrons - which it does. But the residual strong force (which has also been called the colour fource) is also what holds protons together. The weak force mediates beta decay, and the residual weak force (or more accurately, the residual electroweak force) is electromagnetism.

Thanks for the correction
Steven Novella
Host, The Skeptics Guide
snovella@theness.com