Author Topic: Ignore this, should have searched first.  (Read 2492 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zookster

  • Lightly seared on the reality grill
  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 2131
Ignore this, should have searched first.
« on: October 01, 2008, 10:24:04 AM »
.
Massey: No, he needs to be left alone.  We can't fix any of this with violence.
Schlock: You're just afraid to use enough of it.
-----------------
Tagon: So what is it, gas?  Ice crystals?
Ennesby:  It's a melange.
Tagon: I didn't ask what colour it was!

Offline SQ the ΣΛ/IGMд

  • Atheist extraordinaire
  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 12652
  • Pondering the cosmos since 1969
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2008, 12:43:24 PM »
how can I ignore such an awesome period?
"That's ridiculous, spooks. That's silly!" ~ The Tin Woodsman - The Wizard of Oz ~

"Like it or not, we are stuck with science.  We had better make the best of it." ~ Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World ~

Offline Jim S

  • I demand that you shoot me now!
  • Too Much Spare Time
  • ********
  • Posts: 7207
  • karma: -9001
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2008, 10:42:09 PM »
It was one of the most productive periods in our history.
A bit of dumb, On a flea, On the wing, On the fly, On the frog, On the bump, On the log, In the hole, In the middle of the sea of awesome.

Offline philoskeptic

  • Keeps Priorities Straight
  • ***
  • Posts: 261
  • May Critical Thinking Be Your "Guiding Light"
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2008, 04:26:15 AM »
this must be his period period before he moved on to his semi colon work, which, in my opinion, is some of his best work.
I'm a philosopher and a skeptic. I don't believe that I'm a philosopher and I question that I'm a skeptic.

Offline Sordid

  • Stopped Going Outside
  • *******
  • Posts: 5792
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2008, 04:29:14 AM »
Isn't period supposed to be, like, red? ???

Offline Ole Eivind

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 3671
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2008, 04:29:39 AM »
this must be his period period before he moved on to his semi colon work, which, in my opinion, is some of his best work.

Yeah, it became a tad repetative when he moved on to ellipses.

Offline Ole Eivind

  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 3671
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2008, 04:31:22 AM »
Isn't period supposed to be, like, red? ???

That, or all dressed up and featuring Colin Firth.

Offline Zookster

  • Lightly seared on the reality grill
  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 2131
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2008, 04:38:23 AM »
You guys crack me up.

 ;D
Massey: No, he needs to be left alone.  We can't fix any of this with violence.
Schlock: You're just afraid to use enough of it.
-----------------
Tagon: So what is it, gas?  Ice crystals?
Ennesby:  It's a melange.
Tagon: I didn't ask what colour it was!

Offline Zabulon

  • Fails the Turing-test
  • Seasoned Contributor
  • ****
  • Posts: 923
  • Foxhole atheist
    • My band
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2008, 05:36:47 AM »
Hey, up your crack, Zookster!
In Cod we Trust

Offline philoskeptic

  • Keeps Priorities Straight
  • ***
  • Posts: 261
  • May Critical Thinking Be Your "Guiding Light"
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2008, 06:07:10 AM »
Didn't he earn his wings when he was in his red period? ;)
I'm a philosopher and a skeptic. I don't believe that I'm a philosopher and I question that I'm a skeptic.

Offline Jim S

  • I demand that you shoot me now!
  • Too Much Spare Time
  • ********
  • Posts: 7207
  • karma: -9001
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2008, 11:35:17 PM »
Didn't he earn his wings when he was in his red period? ;)

OK, that was wrong.  I hadn't thought about that in years. 
A bit of dumb, On a flea, On the wing, On the fly, On the frog, On the bump, On the log, In the hole, In the middle of the sea of awesome.

Offline Karyn

  • Forum Sexologist
  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 12818
  • currently recuiting for my lesbian cabal.
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2008, 01:23:03 AM »
okay.  I'm the only one here that has any authority on the period, so I don't even want to hear it out of you boys...unless you have like a legitimate question in regards to the subject at hand.

Offline Jim S

  • I demand that you shoot me now!
  • Too Much Spare Time
  • ********
  • Posts: 7207
  • karma: -9001
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2008, 03:32:27 AM »
okay.  I'm the only one here that has any authority on the period, so I don't even want to hear it out of you boys...unless you have like a legitimate question in regards to the subject at hand.

OK, I have a question about periods:
Will you please define a period based on the formula , used to calculate via what is sometimes called the stroboscope effect, the period of a very high frequency, where:
the known reference frequency is  f0,
the measured frequency is f.
the count based on the stroboscopic effect is Δf
A bit of dumb, On a flea, On the wing, On the fly, On the frog, On the bump, On the log, In the hole, In the middle of the sea of awesome.

Offline Karyn

  • Forum Sexologist
  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 12818
  • currently recuiting for my lesbian cabal.
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2008, 10:09:31 AM »
okay.  I'm the only one here that has any authority on the period, so I don't even want to hear it out of you boys...unless you have like a legitimate question in regards to the subject at hand.

OK, I have a question about periods:
Will you please define a period based on the formula , used to calculate via what is sometimes called the stroboscope effect, the period of a very high frequency, where:
the known reference frequency is  f0,
the measured frequency is f.
the count based on the stroboscopic effect is Δf

You can find the answer to your question here.

Offline spiney

  • Reef Tank Owner
  • *********
  • Posts: 8831
Re: Ignore this, should have searched first.
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2008, 12:44:37 PM »
Damn. Have fallen for the old "do not read this" Trick. Almost as bad as "Please ignore this sign".