Author Topic: Sequels made long after the original  (Read 4820 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ah.hell

  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 13489
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2017, 05:00:05 pm »
Spoiler
Finding Dory

Star Trek the Motion Picture, if that counts.
Doesn't count but only because it wasn't any good :P

Godfather 3
The Two Jakes
Mad Max The fury road
Clerks 2
Star Wars: The Force Awakens


I have high hopes for Twin Peaks
I would debate most of those but....I'll let them count.

I was thinking movies but sure, why not books.
[close]
Oh I see its only stuff that YOU think is good, yea that will be harder, I love every film I listed including Star Trek the Motion Picture.
Not really, I was being overly critical because it amuses me, except for Star Trek, I've long been confused by the love of that movies in some quarters and I consider myself a Trek fan, but that conversation has been held elsewhere. 

Truth be told, I'm surprise at how quickly and how many examples have been listed.

Offline Captain Video

  • Superhero of the Silver Screen
  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 3790
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2017, 05:08:44 pm »
Spoiler
Finding Dory

Star Trek the Motion Picture, if that counts.
Doesn't count but only because it wasn't any good :P

Godfather 3
The Two Jakes
Mad Max The fury road
Clerks 2
Star Wars: The Force Awakens


I have high hopes for Twin Peaks
I would debate most of those but....I'll let them count.

I was thinking movies but sure, why not books.
[close]
Oh I see its only stuff that YOU think is good, yea that will be harder, I love every film I listed including Star Trek the Motion Picture.
Not really, I was being overly critical because it amuses me, except for Star Trek, I've long been confused by the love of that movies in some quarters and I consider myself a Trek fan, but that conversation has been held elsewhere. 

Truth be told, I'm surprise at how quickly and how many examples have been listed.

I was just teasing anyway, check this out

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_longest_gaps_between_film_sequels

Offline PANTS!

  • One leg at a time.
  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 12241
  • What seals I auditioned for this job.
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #17 on: January 24, 2017, 08:10:58 pm »
Spoiler
Finding Dory

Star Trek the Motion Picture, if that counts.
Doesn't count but only because it wasn't any good :P

Godfather 3
The Two Jakes
Mad Max The fury road
Clerks 2
Star Wars: The Force Awakens


I have high hopes for Twin Peaks
I would debate most of those but....I'll let them count.

I was thinking movies but sure, why not books.
[close]
Oh I see its only stuff that YOU think is good, yea that will be harder, I love every film I listed including Star Trek the Motion Picture.
Not really, I was being overly critical because it amuses me, except for Star Trek, I've long been confused by the love of that movies in some quarters and I consider myself a Trek fan, but that conversation has been held elsewhere. 

Truth be told, I'm surprise at how quickly and how many examples have been listed.

I was just teasing anyway, check this out

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_longest_gaps_between_film_sequels

Oh thats a good pair from this list:

The Hustler & The Color of Money

And I loved the Naverone series - perhaps why I cottoned onto Rogue One.  YMMV on that one tho
Large data of text  or Mediumtext or Longtext

Offline Captain Video

  • Superhero of the Silver Screen
  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 3790
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #18 on: January 24, 2017, 10:00:13 pm »
Looking over that list Factotum was a fantastic film but I dont consider it to be a sequel to Barfly, (in the same way that Rum Diary is not a sequel to Fear and Loathing) Both versions of Bukowski were really well done, hard to say which I like more.

I also enjoy 2010

Offline Captain Video

  • Superhero of the Silver Screen
  • Frequent Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 3790
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #19 on: January 24, 2017, 10:51:29 pm »
Aliens comes close with a 9 year gap

and then there is this yet to come



Just to reiterate I look forward to this more than I looked forward to Star Wars



I could watch Gordon eating that doughnut for at least 10 more minutes, did you notice how they slowed down the song just teasing and adding to my suspense.

Offline stonesean

  • Too Much Spare Time
  • ********
  • Posts: 7475
  • Dumb sailor on the Sea of Awesome
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2017, 08:29:57 am »
Boy.

Blade Runner II.

I just don't know.

The director is good.  The cast is good.

So much of what made Blade Runner good for me was the sheer believability of the 1980's vision of 2019 Los Angeles and the strength of that cast.  Everyone in the first movie is great.  Even the supporting cast....James Hong, M. Emmett Walsh, Brion James, Edward James Olmos.....everyone.....that vision of the future was so influential that we've seen that world a million times now....

Which version of the movie is this a sequel for?

Well.  There it is.

Offline superdave

  • Too Much Spare Time
  • ********
  • Posts: 6342
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2017, 08:36:46 am »
made a comment on facebook earlier in the week, eventually we will be so over run by sequels, prequels, and remakes, that browsing IMDB will become impossible.

I objectively disavow anyone in the skeptic movement accused of acting illegally or unethically, especially when it comes to violations of personal space or bodily autonomy, or of a prejudiced nature.

Offline drproximo

  • Not Enough Spare Time
  • **
  • Posts: 177
  • fnord
    • View Profile
    • blaugh
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2017, 10:49:14 am »
I'm not sure I'd count the Harry Potter series, was there a 10 year gap in their publication or filming?

Exactly 10.   >:D

I think the criteria is too loose then, because the HP series was an ongoing series with no significant gap between any two consecutive entries, so it's hard to call it a 10-year "gap" when there was a regular stream of material the entire time.
Large data of text  or Mediumtext or Longtext

Offline Ah.hell

  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 13489
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #23 on: January 25, 2017, 11:18:25 am »
I'm not sure I'd count the Harry Potter series, was there a 10 year gap in their publication or filming?

Exactly 10.   >:D

I think the criteria is too loose then, because the HP series was an ongoing series with no significant gap between any two consecutive entries, so it's hard to call it a 10-year "gap" when there was a regular stream of material the entire time.
I'd argue that just means Pants just doesn't understand what "Gap" means. 
gap: an unfilled space or interval; a break in continuity. 

There wasn't a 10 year gap, it was a 10 year span of Harry Potter and so, Harry Potter doesn't count.

Offline Ah.hell

  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 13489
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #24 on: January 25, 2017, 11:22:02 am »
Boy.

Blade Runner II.

I just don't know.

The director is good.  The cast is good.

So much of what made Blade Runner good for me was the sheer believability of the 1980's vision of 2019 Los Angeles and the strength of that cast.  Everyone in the first movie is great.  Even the supporting cast....James Hong, M. Emmett Walsh, Brion James, Edward James Olmos.....everyone.....that vision of the future was so influential that we've seen that world a million times now....

Which version of the movie is this a sequel for?
Doesn't really matter I suppose, but one where Decker isn't a replicant or at least a replicant without an expiration date.
I agree that the original was a tremendous cast but for me its all about tone and vision.  Hard to imagine how they can replicate that without....coming up short.  I'm cautiously pessimistic. 

Offline brilligtove

  • Too Much Spare Time
  • ********
  • Posts: 7679
  • Ignorance can be cured. Stupidity, you deal with.
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #25 on: January 25, 2017, 11:23:51 am »
Boy.

Blade Runner II.

I just don't know.

The director is good.  The cast is good.

So much of what made Blade Runner good for me was the sheer believability of the 1980's vision of 2019 Los Angeles and the strength of that cast.  Everyone in the first movie is great.  Even the supporting cast....James Hong, M. Emmett Walsh, Brion James, Edward James Olmos.....everyone.....that vision of the future was so influential that we've seen that world a million times now....

Which version of the movie is this a sequel for?

Good question - what counts as the canonical Blade Runner?

And remember, we still have two years to achieve most of the Blade Runner distopia. :)
Large data of text  or Mediumtext or Longtext

Offline SkeptiQueer

  • Too Much Spare Time
  • ********
  • Posts: 7736
  • DEEZ NUTZ
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #26 on: January 25, 2017, 11:32:41 am »
Spoiler
Finding Dory

Star Trek the Motion Picture, if that counts.
Doesn't count but only because it wasn't any good

Godfather 3
The Two Jakes
Mad Max The fury road
Clerks 2
Star Wars: The Force Awakens


I have high hopes for Twin Peaks
I would debate most of those but....I'll let them count.

I was thinking movies but sure, why not books.
[close]
Oh I see its only stuff that YOU think is good, yea that will be harder, I love every film I listed including Star Trek the Motion Picture.
Not really, I was being overly critical because it amuses me, except for Star Trek, I've long been confused by the love of that movies in some quarters and I consider myself a Trek fan, but that conversation has been held elsewhere. 

Truth be told, I'm surprise at how quickly and how many examples have been listed.

I was just teasing anyway, check this out

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_longest_gaps_between_film_sequels
Well TIL there were more shitty sequels in 2016 than I knew. Hard Target II and Kindergarten Cop II?
HIISSSSSSSS

Offline PANTS!

  • One leg at a time.
  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 12241
  • What seals I auditioned for this job.
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #27 on: January 25, 2017, 12:10:14 pm »
I think the criteria is too loose then, because the HP series was an ongoing series with no significant gap between any two consecutive entries, so it's hard to call it a 10-year "gap" when there was a regular stream of material the entire time.
I'd argue that just means Pants just doesn't understand what "Gap" means. 
gap: an unfilled space or interval; a break in continuity. 

There wasn't a 10 year gap, it was a 10 year span of Harry Potter and so, Harry Potter doesn't count.

There was a Gap between novel one and novel seven.  It's the Potter of the Gaps.

Well TIL there were more shitty sequels in 2016 than I knew. Hard Target II and Kindergarten Cop II?

They are not a tumor.
Large data of text  or Mediumtext or Longtext

Offline Ah.hell

  • Poster of Extraordinary Magnitude
  • **********
  • Posts: 13489
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #28 on: January 25, 2017, 12:23:55 pm »
Well TIL there were more shitty sequels in 2016 than I knew. Hard Target II and Kindergarten Cop II?
Its not so much that they're shitty sequels but that they're sequels to shitty movies.  Who was asking for Hard Target II and Kindergarten Cop II?  For KCII, the answer is obvious, Dolph Lundgren, but other than Dolph Lundgren?

Online arthwollipot

  • Reef Tank Owner
  • *********
  • Posts: 9600
  • Observer of Phenomena
    • View Profile
Re: Sequels made long after the original
« Reply #29 on: January 25, 2017, 05:02:44 pm »
Are we limited to TV and movies? There are some long-after book series (Foundation, for example) that could be discussed.

If we are counting books, the novel Cyteen was written by CJ Cherryh and published in 1988. The sequel Regenesis was published in 2009. The most impressive thing is that Regenesis picks up right where Cyteen leaves off, which is (basically) in the middle of an action scene, with no suggestion of a break. You could chain-read them and not even notice where one left off and the other picked up.
Self-described nerd. Pronouns: He/Him.