Another erratum (potential):
p. 418 of US hardcover (chapter on exorcism), 3rd line from bottom, reads:
"This is what the world is like with some skeptical principles as a guide and caution."
perhaps should read:
"This is what the world is like without some skeptical principles as a guide and caution."
Otherwise, enjoying the book very much. A good reference that I'm glad to have on my shelf. I'm not the dullest knife in the drawer, but I do sometimes have trouble identifying certain types of logical fallacies in the name that logical fallacy segments. Some kinds are easy - ad hominems, for example. Others, there seems to be enough conceptual overlap (appeal to nature vs. naturalistic, e.g.) that it's only clear to me in retrospect which one applies (and then, it's like, "of course - why didn't I see that?"). I suppose with practice, I'd get better at picking it out before the reveal.
Am considering ordering a bunch to give away to friends/family who might need and appreciate it. There are those for whom such gifts can backfire (like my cousin the naturopath) much like if someone passed along to me a copy of their holy book or a link to their favorite conspiracy blog. But there are many others who are naturally skeptical towards some of the obviously fake (Bigfoot, alien abduction), but may not have the skeptical toolkit to discern the more subtle forms of nonsense (GMOs, false balance, p-hacking). For them, this book is gold.