Have the rich and powerful lost their altruistic instincts?

[Desert Fox]

What do you think we are all at present as we live in oligarchies?

Some of us are just blind to the field slaves from out position as well kept house slaves.

If we were in the wilderness hunting for our families, we would still have responsibilities. 
That is part of life.

[John Albert]

What do you think we are all at present as we live in oligarchies?

Some of us are just blind to the field slaves from out position as well kept house slaves.

I see what you did there, equating "slavery" as metaphor for the need to contribute work in exchange for participation in society, with human traffickers exerting total domination over a sub-class of human beings and their descendants in perpetuity.

Seems like a bit of a stretch.

[Gnostic Christian Bishop]

What do you think we are all at present as we live in oligarchies?

Some of us are just blind to the field slaves from out position as well kept house slaves.

I see what you did there, equating "slavery" as metaphor for the need to contribute work in exchange for participation in society, with human traffickers exerting total domination over a sub-class of human beings and their descendants in perpetuity.

Seems like a bit of a stretch.

I see what you did there.

Indeed. That was your doing and not mine.

Regards
DL

[arthwollipot]

What do you think we are all at present as we live in oligarchies?

Some of us are just blind to the field slaves from out position as well kept house slaves.

I see what you did there, equating "slavery" as metaphor for the need to contribute work in exchange for participation in society, with human traffickers exerting total domination over a sub-class of human beings and their descendants in perpetuity.

Seems like a bit of a stretch.

I see what you did there.

Indeed. That was your doing and not mine.

Regards
DL

Was John Albert wrong? Are you talking about the literal owning of human beings as property?

[Gnostic Christian Bishop]

Was John Albert wrong? Are you talking about the literal owning of human beings as property?

Slavery is generally described as ownership of the slave, yes.

If illegal, that can happen. If legal, we could devise rules and protections for slaves the same way they were protected in the distant past. Beating rules, time limits of servitude etc.

At present, we are not acknowledging or protecting our slaved populations.

Regards
DL

[haudace]

Ah, you are on the right track. Why stop there?

Let's legalize rape, we could provide condoms and a safe environment to the victims.

Let's legalize murder, to ensure victims are slaughtered in the most humane way.

Let's legalize female genital mutilation, so girls are under anesthesia when their clitoris is removed.

Absurd trolling.

[Gnostic Christian Bishop]

Ah, you are on the right track. Why stop there?

Let's legalize rape, we could provide condoms and a safe environment to the victims.

Let's legalize murder, to ensure victims are slaughtered in the most humane way.

Let's legalize female genital mutilation, so girls are under anesthesia when their clitoris is removed.

Absurd trolling.

Yes you do, but I agree with your last. That would be better than the nothing we now do for those girls, just like the nothing we do for modern slaves.

Regards
DL

[moj]

Ah, you are on the right track. Why stop there?

Let's legalize rape, we could provide condoms and a safe environment to the victims.

Let's legalize murder, to ensure victims are slaughtered in the most humane way.

Let's legalize female genital mutilation, so girls are under anesthesia when their clitoris is removed.

Absurd trolling.

Yes you do, but I agree with your last. That would be better than the nothing we now do for those girls, just like the nothing we do for modern slaves.

Regards
DL

yawn, you bore me troll, do better.

[arthwollipot]

Was John Albert wrong? Are you talking about the literal owning of human beings as property?

Slavery is generally described as ownership of the slave, yes.

If illegal, that can happen. If legal, we could devise rules and protections for slaves the same way they were protected in the distant past. Beating rules, time limits of servitude etc.

At present, we are not acknowledging or protecting our slaved populations.

Regards
DL

Your views are absurd and abhorrent and you should be ashamed.

[haudace]

Ah, you are on the right track. Why stop there?

Let's legalize rape, we could provide condoms and a safe environment to the victims.

Let's legalize murder, to ensure victims are slaughtered in the most humane way.

Let's legalize female genital mutilation, so girls are under anesthesia when their clitoris is removed.

Absurd trolling.

Yes you do, but I agree with your last. That would be better than the nothing we now do for those girls, just like the nothing we do for modern slaves.

Regards
DL

Trolling Rule #1 - DO NOT ADMIT THAT YOU ARE TROLLING.

 

[RGU]

Can you provide examples of the rules and laws that were put in place by "the ancients". I would love to see a copy.
Thank you

[John Albert]

At present, we are not acknowledging or protecting our slaved populations.

Who do you mean by "we"?

What do you mean by "slaved"?

Which slave populations are not being acknowledged?

[random poet]

At present, we are not acknowledging or protecting our slaved populations.

Who do you mean by "we"?

What do you mean by "slaved"?

Which slave populations are not being acknowledged?

Those are good questions for GCB, the person who actually wrote that sentence.

[John Albert]

At present, we are not acknowledging or protecting our slaved populations.

Who do you mean by "we"?

What do you mean by "slaved"?

Which slave populations are not being acknowledged?

Those are good questions for GCB, the person who actually wrote that sentence.

Oops, editing error. I just went back and fixed it.

Here:

At present, we are not acknowledging or protecting our slaved populations.

Who do you mean by "we"?

What do you mean by "slaved"?

Which slave populations are not being acknowledged?