(http://i.imgur.com/MmEzCZv.jpg)(http://wpbusinesstips.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/mailchimp.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/MmEzCZv.jpg)I am 98% mailkimp. :(
(http://i.imgur.com/MmEzCZv.jpg)I am 98% mailkimp. :(
If you drop the 's' it'll auto-embed the naked link.
(http://i.imgur.com/fq8eKUu.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/8WLbluq.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/rJXcrPP.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/rJXcrPP.png)
And here I thought that was a liberal flavor of stupid.
Holy false dilemmas, Batman.
Buuuuuuuuuuuulllshiiiiiiiiiiiiiit. I just pointed out to you my own viewpoint, which offers a third POV that your false dilemma neglected, literally in the same exact post you quoted part of.
You imply that people who think that folks who believe "vaccination is wise" as well as "mandatory vaccination is wise" can also only believe "a stitch in time saves nine is wise, therefore pre-emptive hemming should be mandatory". It is a ridiculous position to take, which is why somebody named a fallacy after it.
Curiosity drill site reveals gray-blue 'dirt' beneath Mars' oxidized surface:
The future of lighting will be very cool!
Cool! Need these in my basement, where we hang out.The future of lighting will be very cool!
Very much looking forward to getting some of these: http://weburbanist.com/2015/02/17/new-artificial-lighting-tricks-human-brain-into-seeing-sunlight/ (http://weburbanist.com/2015/02/17/new-artificial-lighting-tricks-human-brain-into-seeing-sunlight/)
Curiosity drill site reveals gray-blue 'dirt' beneath Mars' oxidized surface:
it would be awesome if they made a bag big enough to life the cow off the ground.
(http://i.imgur.com/B5PRarL.jpg)
(http://imageshack.com/a/img661/8528/DyGjW7.jpg)
i think its because of fishing.
(click to show/hide)
i think its because of fishing.
Or because men blaspheme more frequently?
;D
(http://imageshack.com/a/img537/5921/vhQIUz.jpg)
(click to show/hide)
One of the biggest problems with Celsius is that they used 100 degrees for boiling instead of 10 degrees... or maybe 1000 would've been OK. Also, unit of gram is too small for the base unit - a gram should've been the mass of a liter of water, not a mililiter.
We should re-do this.
Pluto:
(http://i.imgur.com/71dgASR.jpg)
Gentlemen, Pluto (again):
(http://i.imgur.com/z8reN4v.png)
Gentlemen, Pluto (again):
(http://i.imgur.com/z8reN4v.png)
Gentlemen, Pluto (again):
(http://i.imgur.com/z8reN4v.png)
Looks like no place you want to raise your kids.
Gentlemen, Pluto's backside:
Can someone explain the difference between a Lagrange point and a Trojan point? I always get hung up on that.
Gentlemen, Pluto w/true color data:
(http://i.imgur.com/tOtCIaX.jpg)
Gentlemen, Pluto w/true color data:
(http://i.imgur.com/tOtCIaX.jpg)
Gentlemen, Pluto (again):
(http://i.imgur.com/z8reN4v.png)
Gentlemen, Pluto w/true color data:
(http://i.imgur.com/tOtCIaX.jpg)
Right. My art education fails me. What am I looking at here, Anders?
(http://i.imgur.com/CxbrBQe.png)
from twitter
(http://imageshack.com/a/img538/5416/ZNFXcr.jpg)
???
Why not? It looks like they were probably using the cow model to test out their software for mapping airflow. Notice how the cow has its nose directly into the oncoming wind. Real cows don't do that - they tend to turn their tails to the wind.
(http://i.imgur.com/B5PRarL.jpg)I get that humans aren't as good at hanging around in trees as apes are, but did they really have to just impale her throat on that branch like that?
Can someone explain the difference between a Lagrange point and a Trojan point? I always get hung up on that.The two Trojan points are among the five Lagrange points.
Can someone explain the difference between a Lagrange point and a Trojan point? I always get hung up on that.The two Trojan points are among the five Lagrange points.
In astronomy, a trojan is a minor planet or moon that shares an orbit with a planet or larger moon, but does not collide with it because it orbits near one of the two trojan points—the Lagrangian points of stability, L4 and L5—which lie approximately 60° ahead of and behind the larger body, respectively. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_%28astronomy%29)
Trojans are the objects, and they sit near the Trojan points, which is what Redamare was asking about.
Good job, anti-vaxxers!
(http://i.imgur.com/BGgIyEkl.jpg)
Backside of the moonYou could have captioned this, "Mooned by the Moon", but you didn't. For that I will never forgive you.
(http://i.imgur.com/XYMgRMk.jpg)
...
Dr Ed Hawkins, a climate scientist at the Department of Meteorology at the University of Reading who created the visualisation, told MailOnline: 'I wanted to try to visualise the global changes we have seen in different ways to learn about how we might improve our communication.
'The pace of change is immediately obvious, especially over the past few decades, and the relationship between current global temperatures and the internationally discussed limits are also clear.'
Within the animation it is also possible to see how global events such as the El Nino phenomenon alter temperatures around the world.
For example, there is a small amount of cooling between the 1880s and 1910 due to volcanic eruptions before warming again between 1910 and the 1940s.
Dr Hawkins said this warming was due to a small increase in solar output and natural variability and recovery from the volcanic eruptions.
Temperatures also remain largely flat between the 1950s and the 1970s, he explained in his blog, because aerosols released into the atmosphere mask the impact of greenhouse gases.
But from 1980 there is strong warming with temperatures pushed particularly high in 1998 and 2016 due to strong El Nino events.
...
(http://i.imgur.com/EbOGgifl.jpg)
Molten salt in water.
(https://giant.gfycat.com/RegularUnequaledDungenesscrab.gif)
It's just thermal.
It's just thermal.
What's causing the delay there? It sits in the water for about a second, with nothing happening, and suddenly WHOOMPH!
It's just thermal.
What's causing the delay there? It sits in the water for about a second, with nothing happening, and suddenly WHOOMPH!
that's 5000 frames per second. "Time is an illusion. Lunch time doubly so."
We can see when the video slows down. That still doesn't explain why it falls into the water a ways before exploding.It's just thermal.
What's causing the delay there? It sits in the water for about a second, with nothing happening, and suddenly WHOOMPH!
that's 5000 frames per second. "Time is an illusion. Lunch time doubly so."
So pouring molten [anything else] into water would have the same explosive result?
No, I think there's a chemical reaction going on.
So pouring molten [anything else] into water would have the same explosive result?
The sodium wouldn't react with the water because it's chemically bonded to the chlorine. Even heating it to molten won't demolecularise the salt.
it would be awesome if they made a bag big enough to life the cow off the ground.I would immediately invest in car wash company stock.
HFACTOR infuses pure hydrogen into water via patent-pending natural methods, unlike other hydrogen products which are manufactured utilizing magnesium and chemical processes.
Wait, what's extra hydrogen suppose to do for you?
Wait, what's extra hydrogen suppose to do for you?
Very good question
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's just thermal.
What's causing the delay there? It sits in the water for about a second, with nothing happening, and suddenly WHOOMPH!
that's 5000 frames per second. "Time is an illusion. Lunch time doubly so."
Found the original:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDRWQUUUCF0
Compare what? It's the same video.Oops, sorry about that. I went back and fixed it.
Wait, what's extra hydrogen suppose to do for you?
(http://i.imgur.com/CX57yWF.jpg)
(https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1701/EclipseClouds_MODISanderson_1415.jpg)
Where to see the American Eclipse (https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/)
My wife's uncle is renting a cabin in the zone, we plan on spending the weekend with them for it.(https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1701/EclipseClouds_MODISanderson_1415.jpg)
Where to see the American Eclipse (https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/)(click to show/hide)
I was just thinking this morning..."Huh, I wonder how they make non-organic tea."They use pianos.
(https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv)I wish I could think of some biting comment to post...
https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv
(https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv)I wish I could think of some biting comment to post...
https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv
Fangs for the sharky reply.(https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv)I wish I could think of some biting comment to post...
https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv
You'll be long in the tooth before anything comes to you.
Fangs for the sharky reply.(https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv)I wish I could think of some biting comment to post...
https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv
You'll be long in the tooth before anything comes to you.
You should hire a retainer to work that out for you.Fangs for the sharky reply.(https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv)I wish I could think of some biting comment to post...
https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv
You'll be long in the tooth before anything comes to you.
I'm trying to find the wisdom in these posts.
You should hire a retainer to work that out for you.Fangs for the sharky reply.(https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv)I wish I could think of some biting comment to post...
https://i.imgur.com/o1490ps.gifv
You'll be long in the tooth before anything comes to you.
I'm trying to find the wisdom in these posts.
This thread is practically transcend dental.
This thread is practically transcend dental.
Can I join the pun parade or should I bite my tongue?
My wife's uncle is renting a cabin in the zone, we plan on spending the weekend with them for it.(https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1701/EclipseClouds_MODISanderson_1415.jpg)
Where to see the American Eclipse (https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/)(click to show/hide)
Every movement that has rejected a scientific consensus, whether it be on evolution, climate change or the link between smoking and cancer, exhibits the same five characteristics of science denial (concisely summarized by the acronym FLICC). These are fake experts, logical fallacies, impossible expectations, cherry picking and conspiracy theories. When someone wants to cast doubt on a scientific finding, FLICC is an integral part of the misinformation toolbox.https://skepticalscience.com/gorilla-suits-and-blowfish-fallacies.html
What do gorilla suits and blowfish fallacies have to do with climate change?
QuoteEvery movement that has rejected a scientific consensus, whether it be on evolution, climate change or the link between smoking and cancer, exhibits the same five characteristics of science denial (concisely summarized by the acronym FLICC). These are fake experts, logical fallacies, impossible expectations, cherry picking and conspiracy theories. When someone wants to cast doubt on a scientific finding, FLICC is an integral part of the misinformation toolbox.https://skepticalscience.com/gorilla-suits-and-blowfish-fallacies.html
What do gorilla suits and blowfish fallacies have to do with climate change?
That's...not how the uncertainty principle works
That's...not how the uncertainty principle worksYeah, it properly reads "Am I going to get laid tonight?"
It's suspected that the President watches Infowars and talks to Alex Jones.
This is Alex Jones.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Km5UVbP2Fs
"How did the pedophiles get an AI?"
- Joe Rogan, to Alex Jones
That's...not how the uncertainty principle worksYeah, it properly reads "Am I going to get laid tonight?"
That's Schroedinger's Cat, not the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. The HUP states that, essentially, it is impossible to know, for very small objects (like subatomic particle levels of smallness), exactly where the object at the time of detection *and* its speed. There are ways you can figure out either one individually but not both at the same time.
That's Schroedinger's Cat, not the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. The HUP states that, essentially, it is impossible to know, for very small objects (like subatomic particle levels of smallness), exactly where the object at the time of detection *and* its speed. There are ways you can figure out either one individually but not both at the same time.
That's Schroedinger's Cat and the Uncertainty Principle.
If you try to see whether or not you will get laid tonight, that will have an effect on whether or not you will get laid tonight.
There is all the observer effect, where actually observing something changes its nature.
Sometimes it seems there's more uncertainty than certainty.
There is also the observer effect, where actually observing something changes its nature.
Sometimes it seems there's more uncertainty than certainty.
I don't know about that.
There is all the observer effect, where actually observing something changes its nature.The idea that a particle has an exact momentum and position and we just can't pin down one without messing up the other is a common misconception.
There is all the observer effect, where actually observing something changes its nature.The idea that a particle has an exact momentum and position and we just can't pin down one without messing up the other is a common misconception.
The misconception is that a particle has an exact momentum and position. Which is why I said that.There is all the observer effect, where actually observing something changes its nature.The idea that a particle has an exact momentum and position and we just can't pin down one without messing up the other is a common misconception.
I think the idea is that we can know a sub-atomic particle's position or it's momentum, but if we know one we can't know the other. You think that's a misconception?
Despite what Jeff Goldblum might tell you, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle had no applicability to dinosaurs on Isla Sorna.His is position was similar to "if we observe the Andromeda Galaxy we have affected the Andromeda Galaxy." Stupid on the face of it.
Well, you're taking one side of a controversy (which is fair enough) and then calling the other side a "misconception" (which is no settled matter).Didn't you just say "that's true" when I said it wasn't the observer effect, and now when I repeated that you're saying it's not settled?
What position do you think you're arguing against?
I never said that actively measuring subatomic things doesn't have an effect on them.
I just pointed out that there's a common misconception that this is the only reason we can't pin down position and momentum at the same time. The misconception is that a particle has an exact momentum and position. I keep repeating that because I don't know how to say it more simply.
(https://i.imgur.com/klKShkp.gif)
That website is a terrible spam trap.
And some people still think there's no God!
And some people still think there's no God!
I know you're joking, but it's precisely images like that that reinforce my non-belief. The incongruity of the tininess and insignificance of organisms in an impossibly thin organic layer on a small rocky planet in this endless sea of nothingness teeming with galaxies filled with billions of stars with the idea that these organisms are somehow significant is just absurd. We're the bacteria on a speck of dust in a cathedral and we think the music is playing for us.
That place must have either really bad tires or really bad roads.Or neither. They were collected to be recycled. Then lightning hit the pile and it ignited. (Assuming it's the tire conflagration I'm familiar with.) Those industrial-strength rubber mats that are used to soften the floor a bit for workers are made out of old tires, and there are other uses as well.
To be fair, that image alone doesn't prove climate change, or really anything other than tyres, when burned, produce black smoke. It could be argued either that the smoke is not harmful, or that it dissipates into the atmosphere, or something like that. Then you have to go and find some actual data.Did I say it did?
Did I say that you said it did?To be fair, that image alone doesn't prove climate change, or really anything other than tyres, when burned, produce black smoke. It could be argued either that the smoke is not harmful, or that it dissipates into the atmosphere, or something like that. Then you have to go and find some actual data.Did I say it did?
"To be fair..." is a code for "You're wrong and here's why."Did I say that you said it did?To be fair, that image alone doesn't prove climate change, or really anything other than tyres, when burned, produce black smoke. It could be argued either that the smoke is not harmful, or that it dissipates into the atmosphere, or something like that. Then you have to go and find some actual data.Did I say it did?
To be fair, the caption given with the image kind of did make the suggestion that a ton of black smoke produced by burning tyres was causally connected to global warming. Which it is."To be fair..." is a code for "You're wrong and here's why."Did I say that you said it did?To be fair, that image alone doesn't prove climate change, or really anything other than tyres, when burned, produce black smoke. It could be argued either that the smoke is not harmful, or that it dissipates into the atmosphere, or something like that. Then you have to go and find some actual data.Did I say it did?
(http://i.imgur.com/ZTajzCB.jpg)♫Little brown jug, oh I love you!
Hot Take:
(http://i.imgur.com/log7TmE.png)
AeroFarms, a vertical farm in New Jersey:Ah, "city farms" prototype?
(http://i.imgur.com/pmIkyAD.jpg)
AeroFarms, a vertical farm in New Jersey:Ah, "city farms" prototype?
(http://i.imgur.com/pmIkyAD.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/Xx5AUfp.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/Xx5AUfp.jpg)
1912! Holy shit I thought the earliest predictions were in the 30s!
Arrhenius’s paper is the first to quantify the contribution of carbon dioxide to the greenhouse effect (Sections I-IV) and to speculate about whether variations in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide have contributed to long-term variations in climate (Section V). Throughout this paper, Arrhenius refers to carbon dioxide as “carbonic acid” in accordance with the convention at the time he was writing.
Contrary to some misunderstandings, Arrhenius does not explicitly suggest in this paper that the burning of fossil fuels will cause global warming, though it is clear that he is aware that fossil fuels are a potentially significant source of carbon dioxide (page 270), and he does explicitly suggest this outcome in later work.
Holy crow that took a long time to load.Odd, it went like clockwork for me.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCRyoShXsAIl0cz.jpg:large)
Explanation: Where will you be during the Eclipse across America? On August 21, the shadow of the Moon will cross the continental USA for the first time since 1979. The predicted path -- a certainty given modern astronomical knowledge -- is shown in the featured NASA video. Most people in the USA will be within a day's drive to the path of the total solar eclipse, while the rest of North America will see a partial solar eclipse. In the path of totality, given clear-enough skies, the Moon will block out the Sun making it eerily dark for as long as 2 minutes and 40 seconds. If interested in attending an eclipse party, please contact your local amateur astronomical society, science center, park, or university to see if one is already being planning. Some eclipse chasers have traveled to the end of the world to see a total eclipse of the Sun, and along the way have recorded many entertaining adventure stories.